Dialogue Tagsets in Oncology
نویسنده
چکیده
Dialogue analysis is widely used in oncology for training health professionals in communication skills. Parameters and tagsets have been developed independently of work in natural language processing. In relation to emergent standards in NLP, syntactic tagging is minimal, semantics is domain-specific, pragmatics is comparable, and the analysis of cognitive affect is richly developed. We suggest productive directions for convergence.
منابع مشابه
Multi-level Dialogue Act Tags
In this paper we discuss the use of multilayered tagsets for dialogue acts, in the context of dialogue understanding for multiparty meeting recording and retrieval applications. We discuss some desiderata for such tagsets and critically examine some previous proposals. We then define MALTUS, a new tagset based on the ICSI-MR and Switchboard tagsets, which satisfies these requirements. We presen...
متن کاملDialogue Acts: One or More Dimensions?
This report surveys the main theories of dialogue and communication that have been used to devise dialogue act tagsets, distinguishing theories that deal with a specific level of communication from theories that integrate several levels. The report proceeds to analyse four dialogue act tagsets that have been used to annotate large scale dialogue corpora (damsl, swbd-damsl, icsi-mrda and maltus)...
متن کاملMultilevel Dialogue Acts and Feature Selection
This report discusses the use of multi-layered tagsets for dialogue acts, in the context of dialogue understanding for multi-party meeting recording and retrieval applications. We discuss some desiderata for such tagsets and critically examine some previous proposals. We then define MALTUS, a new tagset based on the ICSI-MR and Switchboard tagsets, which satisfies these requirements. We present...
متن کاملDimensionality of dialogue act tagsets
This article compares one-dimensional and multi-dimensional dialogue act tagsets used for automatic labeling of utterances. The influence of tagset dimensionality on tagging accuracy is first discussed theoretically, then based on empirical data from human and automatic annotations of large scale resources, using four existing tagsets: DAMSL, SWBD-DAMSL, ICSI-MRDA and MALTUS. The Dominant Funct...
متن کاملEvaluating Dialogue Act Tagging with Naive and Expert Annotators
In this paper the dialogue act annotation of naive and expert annotators, both annotating the same data, are compared in order to characterise the insights annotations made by different kind of annotators may provide for evaluating dialogue act tagsets. It is argued that the agreement among naive annotators provides insight in the clarity of the tagset, whereas agreement among expert annotators...
متن کامل